Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Topic: operator trace
Replies: 24   Last Post: Aug 10, 2005 6:26 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Zdislav V. Kovarik

Posts: 901
Registered: 12/11/04
Re: operator trace
Posted: Aug 7, 2005 4:25 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply



On Sat, 5 Aug 2005, Edward Green wrote:

> The trace of a matrix is the sum of its diagonal elements.
> I've encountered the idea that operators may have traces. Linear
> operators can often be represented by matrices, so, presumably, in case
> the operator is represented by a matrix, the operator trace reduces to
> the matrix trace.
>
> But is there a more general concept of operator trace which does not
> explicitly depend on a matrix representation?


Most responses (maybe all, I may not received all of them yet) considered
traces of operators on Hilbert space.

All you really need in the infinite-dimensional case is a normed vector
space V (the norm does not have to come from an inner product, and the
space need not be complete, nor does it have to have a topological
basis!). For safety's sake, we stipulate that all operators in the
discussion below are bounded with respect to the norm on V.

Finite rank operators have a well-defined trace:

a rank-one operator A=xf (x from V, f from V*, the dual) has a
well-defined trace tr(xf) = f(x). It takes some tedious bookkeeping
algebra to prove that the trace extends linearly to finite-rank operators,
and is independent of the representation using rank-one summands.

Denote F1 the set of bounded finite-rank operators V->V of operator
norm <=1. Then for every linear operator T:V->V and every X from F1,

TX and XT are of finite rank, and tr(TX)=tr(XT) (routine proof).

To put the norm to work, we define the absolute trace of T (need not be
finite) by

||T||_1 = sup{abs(tr(XT)) : X from F1 }

If this absolute trace of T is finite, we call T a trace class operator on
V, and by further work on norms we can prove that the trace extends
linearly and continuously (with respect to the absolute trace, which is a
norm) from finite rank operators to all trace class operators.

Look Ma, no coordinates.

Remark: This definition, restricted to Hilbert spaces, defines the same
set of trace class operators. (An exercise I saw somewhere.)

Also, on Hilbert spaces, the trace class operators are the pre-dual of the
bounded operators. Has anyone studied the Banach space setup of this fact?

Cheers, ZVK(Slavek).



Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2010. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Goodwin College of Professional Studies.